Property	Value
name	landing-page
description	Use when designing or rewriting a high-converting landing page (single-offer page) for SaaS/apps/services. Covers structure, layout patterns, conversion strategies, copywriting, SEO/AEO, and common pitfalls.
keywords	web-design, ux-design, layout, responsive, components, best-practices, documentation

Landing Page (High‑Conversion) — Web Design Skill

A landing page is not a homepage. A homepage serves multiple intents. A landing page wins one intent: one offer → one audience → one primary action.

Before you design/write

Gather (ask if missing):

1) Page purpose

• What is the ONE primary action? (trial, demo, buy, waitlist, download)
• What’s the offer? (exactly what do they get?)
• What counts as conversion? (click, signup, purchase)

2) Audience + context

• Who is the ICP?
• What problem are they trying to solve?
• Top 3 objections (why they don’t convert today)
• Traffic source: ads / search / social / email
• What do visitors already know when they land?

3) Proof + assets

• Any proof points: logos, testimonials, numbers, case studies
• Screenshots, demo video, product GIFs
• Guarantees / refund / cancellation terms

4) Constraints

• Brand voice: casual vs professional
• Design direction: minimal editorial vs playful 3D vs glass UI
• Mobile priority?

---

Core structure (what it should include)

Above the fold (must)

1. Headline (outcome + audience)
2. Subheadline (clarifies “how” + adds specificity)
3. Primary CTA (clear verb + what they get)
4. One proof signal (logo strip / stat / short testimonial)
5. Hero visual (product screenshot/video) or a strong illustration

Mid page (argument)

1. Problem → solution (1 section)
2. Benefits (3–5, outcome-driven)
3. How it works (3 steps)
4. Social proof (testimonials/case study)

Bottom (objection handling)

1. FAQ (6–12 Q/A)
2. Risk reversal (trial, cancel anytime, guarantee)
3. Final CTA (same as top)

---

Layout types (pick one)

A) Classic hero + sections (most common)

Best when:

• product is understandable with a hero screenshot

B) Long-form story (sales page)

Best when:

• you need to educate + overcome skepticism

C) Minimal conversion page

Best when:

• high-intent traffic (email → known users)
• short offer (download, waitlist)

D) Comparison landing page

Best when:

• search intent includes alternatives (“X vs Y”, “best for…”)—usually paired with SEO pages

---

High‑conversion strategies (practical)

1) Match message to source

If traffic is from ads:

• mirror the ad headline in the hero
• use the same promise and visual tone

2) Make the next step obvious

• one primary CTA
• avoid multiple competing CTAs above the fold

3) Write benefit-first

• Features: what it does
• Benefits: what that means for them

4) Use specificity

• ❌ “Save time and streamline”
• ✅ “Cut your weekly reporting from 4 hours to 15 minutes”

5) Reduce risk

Pick at least one:

• free trial
• free plan
• no credit card
• cancel anytime
• money-back guarantee

6) Objection handling is a section, not a footer

• add FAQ earlier if it’s a high-friction offer
• put proof right next to the claim it supports

---

Copywriting templates

Headline formulas

• “{Outcome} without {pain}”
• “The {category} for {audience}”
• “Ship {result} in {time}”

Subheadline rules

• 1–2 sentences
• clarify what it is + who it’s for

CTA rules

• Verb + what they get
• Avoid weak CTAs: “Learn more”, “Submit”

Examples:

• “Start free trial”
• “Book a demo”
• “Get the checklist”

Benefit bullets

Format:

• Benefit — proof/detail

Example:

• Faster iteration — generate 3 layout variants in one click.

---

Section-by-section workflow (designer-friendly)

Work in this order:

1. Hero
2. Benefits
3. How it works
4. Proof
5. FAQ
6. Final CTA

Rule: don’t rebuild the whole page each time. Iterate section-by-section to keep control.

---

SEO + AEO checklist (when relevant)

When landing pages should NOT be indexed

• ad-only campaigns
• highly time-bound offers

Use:

• noindex (or keep it behind a non-indexed path)

When they SHOULD be indexed

• evergreen offers
• search intent matches the promise

Add:

• clear title + meta
• internal links from homepage/feature pages
• FAQ in plain Q/A for AEO

Optional:

• FAQ schema (if appropriate)

---

Common pitfalls

• Too many CTAs above the fold
• Vague value prop (“streamline”, “optimize”)
• Big feature list with no outcomes
• Proof hidden at the bottom
• Mobile layout breaks readability
• No clear next step

---

Output format (when generating a landing page)

Return:

1. Page outline (sections + order)
2. Hero copy (headline, subheadline, CTA, proof line)
3. Benefits section (3–5 bullets)
4. How it works (3 steps)
5. FAQ (6–12 Q/A)
6. SEO/AEO (indexing recommendation + title/meta if indexed)
7. Layout recommendation (A/B/C/D + why)

---

Quick questions (if user says “make a landing page”)

• What’s the ONE primary CTA?
• Who is the ICP and what’s the main pain?
• Any proof (numbers/testimonials/logos)?
• What’s the offer and risk reversal?
• Where is traffic coming from?